Milesight vs Teltonika – Which Industrial Router Should You Choose?
Both are solid manufacturers. The right choice depends on your application, existing infrastructure, and support requirements. This comparison covers hardware, software, ecosystem, and price – without bias towards either brand.
Two Good Manufacturers, Different Strengths
Milesight and Teltonika Networks are both well-established industrial IoT router manufacturers. Both produce competent hardware, both have strong European sales, and both are widely deployed in UK infrastructure. The honest answer to “which is better” is that it depends on your project.
Teltonika is a Lithuanian manufacturer that has been building M2M and IoT routers since 2001. They have a larger hardware catalogue, a strong community around their RMS platform, and extensive documentation that makes them a common choice for system integrators building complex configurations. Their RUT series is among the most widely deployed industrial router families in Europe.
Milesight launched their IoT router range in 2011 and has grown quickly on the back of competitive pricing, a strong LoRaWAN product line, and the DeviceHub management platform. They are particularly strong in applications that combine cellular routers with LoRaWAN sensor networks under one management platform.
This comparison focuses on the router product lines that directly compete: Milesight’s UR series against Teltonika’s RUT series. Both support dual SIM and are available through UK distributors including IoT UK.
Feature Comparison
UR35 (Milesight) vs RUT956 (Teltonika) – mid-range industrial 4G routers.
| Cellular standard | 4G LTE Cat 4 | 4G LTE Cat 6 |
| Dual SIM failover | Yes Active-standby | Yes Active-standby |
| RS232 / RS485 | Yes Both included | Yes Both included |
| GNSS / GPS | Optional variant | Yes Built-in standard |
| Wi-Fi | Optional variant | Yes Dual-band standard |
| Digital I/O | 2 DI + 1 DO (standard) | 4 DI + 4 DO (standard) |
| VPN support | OpenVPN, IPsec, WireGuard, L2TP, GRE | OpenVPN, IPsec, WireGuard, L2TP, GRE, ZeroTier |
| Operating temperature | -40°C to +70°C | -40°C to +75°C |
| Management platform | DeviceHub (cloud, proprietary) | RMS (cloud, proprietary) |
| LoRaWAN product line | Yes UG series gateways + UC sensors | No Routers only |
| Community and documentation | Good official docs; smaller community | Large community; extensive wiki; active forums |
| Scripting / SDK | Lua scripting (limited) | RutOS scripting; extensive Lua SDK; built-in MQTT broker |
| Typical price position | Competitive – typically 10-15% below Teltonika equivalent | Slightly premium in the mid-range |
Hardware – Where They Differ
The Teltonika RUT956 includes Wi-Fi and GNSS as standard, where the equivalent Milesight UR35 requires a specific variant for each. If you need both cellular and Wi-Fi in one device, the RUT956 ships with that out of the box. Teltonika also offers more I/O ports as standard – four digital inputs and outputs against two inputs and one output on the UR35. For applications with multiple alarm inputs or relay control requirements, this can matter.
The RUT956 uses a Cat 6 modem (up to 300 Mbps downlink) against the UR35’s Cat 4 (150 Mbps). In practice, most industrial IoT applications consume a few kilobytes per hour and will never approach either limit. LTE category matters for video surveillance; for telemetry and monitoring it is effectively irrelevant to day-to-day operation.
Software and Management Platforms
Teltonika’s RMS is a more mature platform with a larger installed base, better third-party integrations, and more extensive documentation. The scripting and automation capabilities in RutOS are more developed – if you need complex automated configuration or external monitoring platform integrations, Teltonika’s tooling is ahead.
Milesight DeviceHub is simpler and more straightforward to set up. The key advantage is that DeviceHub also manages the UG series LoRaWAN gateways – if you are running a mixed cellular and LoRaWAN network, managing both from one platform has genuine operational value that Teltonika cannot match.
Which Should You Choose?
Neither is objectively better. The right choice depends on what matters most in your project.
Choose Milesight if…
Your project uses or will use LoRaWAN
The combination of UR series routers and UG series LoRaWAN gateways under one management platform is a genuine differentiator.
- You want a combined cellular + LoRaWAN solution from one vendor
- Budget is a priority – Milesight is typically cheaper per unit
- You want simpler management setup with DeviceHub
- Your application does not require extensive on-router scripting
Choose Teltonika if…
You need maximum flexibility and a larger community
Teltonika’s more mature software ecosystem, richer scripting capabilities, and larger community make it better for complex configurations.
- You need extensive scripting, custom logic, or on-router processing
- Your team relies on community documentation and forums
- You need more I/O or built-in Wi-Fi and GNSS as standard
- You are building on an existing Teltonika infrastructure
Still unsure which to specify?
Tell us about your application and we will give you a straightforward recommendation – with no preference for either brand. We stock both.
Ask for Advice